
Because most elements in my work correspond to Freud’s ideas, but Freud’s views don’t fully encompass what I’m creating, and I believe his core idea is to label the triadic personality using multiple phrases, I felt it was essential to study Lacan’s theories for my graduation project. Part of Lacan’s theory builds upon and delves deeper into Freud’s ideas, providing me with a good direction for my thinking.
At this stage, it’s difficult for me to precisely extract all the ideas Lacan intended to express in his poetry, but the core concepts of the triadic theory and the Other and the Lesser Other do provide me with the knowledge and direction I currently seek.
Understanding Lacan’s Theory

Lacan, a scholar on par with Freud, played a crucial role in shaping my thinking during the creation of my graduation project. My understanding of Lacanian theory can be divided into two parts:
First, Lacan’s theory of the three realms: the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real.
The Imaginary originates from Lacan’s theory of the “mirror stage.” Between 6 and 18 months of age, infants first recognize their complete image in a mirror. This image is unified and harmonious, contrasting sharply with the fragmented and discordant feelings the infant internally experiences. The infant then identifies this perfect mirror image as the “self.” This “self” belongs to Lacan’s concept of the self: the “self” we pursue throughout our lives, its foundation being an external, illusory image.
The Symbolic realm is the order of language, law, culture, social norms, and family structure. The Symbolic realm is constituted by language; we do not express ourselves with language, but are spoken of by language. When we say “I,” we are already using a position defined by the Symbolic realm. The embodiment of the symbolic order is the “Other,” the site of our desires.
The Real is a pre-linguistic, unsymbolizable, hardcore. Language and imagery fail before it.
Secondly, there’s Lacan’s concept of the Other and the Lesser Other: In my understanding, the Other and the Lesser Other are roles and functions operating within the three realms.
The Other is the totality of language, culture, social norms, and family rules. When we enter the Symbolic Realm, we enter the realm of the “Other.” The Other constructs our subjectivity and desires; Lacan says, “Human desire is the desire of the Other.” We crave recognition from the Other, and the object of our desires is also the object indicated by the Other. The existence of the Other means that no relationship is purely binary. What I consider right and wrong has a different definition in the face of the Other.
The archetype of the Lesser Other is the unified mirror image identified with by the infant in the mirror stage. In the Imaginary Realm, our relationship with others (i.e., the “Lesser Other”) is a binary, mirror-like relationship. This relationship is full of identification, admiration, jealousy, and aggression. You see friends, lovers, and rivals as if looking in another mirror, projecting your own desires, fears, and idealized image onto them. The Lesser Other appears to be the Other, but is actually merely a reflection of the ego. You think you crave the “small other” itself (like a lover’s approval), but what you actually crave is confirmation of a complete self-image through it. This is an imagined, misrecognized relationship.
This is also the most important factor in introducing Lacanian ideas after deep reflection on my graduation project. That is, there are things that cannot be symbolized; the Real is the remnant that absolutely resists symbolization. It is something that cannot be captured by language, cannot be represented, and cannot be integrated into the symbolic order. I think the concept of the Real is also a breakthrough from the structuralist framework. Although I am creating an animated work, this work itself will be labeled and symbolized by me, the creator, including every shot, action, color, form, etc., all defined by me. I think this is also the definition of animation in structuralism. However, in the actual production process, there are too many details I cannot consider, such as my protagonist instantly transitioning from the real world to the dream world. This transition is difficult for me to create, and the concept of the Real can well encompass this transition because its undefinability provides me with theoretical support to allow this transition to occur naturally.
Previs
In this previs, I made some changes to the shots and framing on the storyboard. The most crucial change was the shot used when the protagonist enters the dream world. I struggled with this for a very long time. I didn’t think it was a good shot; I always want to create my animations in a structural way. However, with Lacan’s theories as a foundation, I think I can accept the current scene transitions, although deep down I still have doubts about this shot.
Character modeling


When it comes to character modeling, I’ve been constantly defining the protagonist’s style. My 2D character designs often differ from my 3D character models, and I’m very willing to overturn previously established ideas and replace them with new ones. My initial 2D character designs leaned towards the style of Japanese animation, but I redesigned them in the 3D world. However, I still retained many details from Japanese animation; for example, I designed the nose to be without nostrils, as I felt nostrils weren’t necessary in my animation, so I omitted them.